Comments on: Why Michael Arrington SHOULD Post Twitter Docs http://linjamie.com/2009/07/15/why-michael-arrington-should-post-twitter-docs/ Analyzing web and green economies, participants and business models. Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:41:40 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9 hourly 1 By: corporate intranet http://linjamie.com/2009/07/15/why-michael-arrington-should-post-twitter-docs/comment-page-1/#comment-16 corporate intranet Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:41:40 +0000 http://linjamie.com/?p=33#comment-16 if you choose to share that $1,000 with the rest of us, then nobody will have an unfair advantage. if you choose to share that $1,000 with the rest of us, then nobody will have an unfair advantage.

]]> By: receipt printer http://linjamie.com/2009/07/15/why-michael-arrington-should-post-twitter-docs/comment-page-1/#comment-13 receipt printer Tue, 06 Oct 2009 03:05:16 +0000 http://linjamie.com/?p=33#comment-13 test test

]]> By: create a resume http://linjamie.com/2009/07/15/why-michael-arrington-should-post-twitter-docs/comment-page-1/#comment-11 create a resume Wed, 16 Sep 2009 08:41:56 +0000 http://linjamie.com/?p=33#comment-11 and who wants to be a martyr and give his profit to other people.. and who wants to be a martyr and give his profit to other people..

]]> By: Jamie Lin http://linjamie.com/2009/07/15/why-michael-arrington-should-post-twitter-docs/comment-page-1/#comment-9 Jamie Lin Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:38:13 +0000 http://linjamie.com/?p=33#comment-9 I think it's a bit different. What I'm saying is if you then hold on to the $1,000, then you're $1,000 richer and if you then use that money to improve your own competency, say getting a new iPhone 3GS, then you suddenly have an advantage over the rest of us. However, if you choose share that $1,000 with the rest of us, then nobody will have an unfair advantage.<br><br>But the analogy is not perfect since money can be returned but information, once disclosed, can't be undisclosed. I think it's a bit different. What I'm saying is if you then hold on to the $1,000, then you're $1,000 richer and if you then use that money to improve your own competency, say getting a new iPhone 3GS, then you suddenly have an advantage over the rest of us. However, if you choose share that $1,000 with the rest of us, then nobody will have an unfair advantage.

But the analogy is not perfect since money can be returned but information, once disclosed, can't be undisclosed.

]]> By: FrankReed http://linjamie.com/2009/07/15/why-michael-arrington-should-post-twitter-docs/comment-page-1/#comment-8 FrankReed Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:31:44 +0000 http://linjamie.com/?p=33#comment-8 So Jamie - Using this logic if I am handed $1,000 that I know was obtained illegally by someone else then it's OK for me to use because possession is 9/10 of the law? So Jamie – Using this logic if I am handed $1,000 that I know was obtained illegally by someone else then it's OK for me to use because possession is 9/10 of the law?

]]>